Money Insurance Utilities Broadband and Mobile Travel So Switch for Business News and Views mobile navigation
You are here: Home > News & Views > Lenders to stop selling PPI

Lenders to stop selling PPI

Jan 22, 2009

medical_history_256 Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) is a topic we have mentioned before and not in a positive way!

Now, some of Britain’s biggest banks will stop selling PPI to those of you taking out a personal loan.

Alliance & Leicester, Barclays, The Co-operative Bank, Lloyds Banking Group, which includes Lloyds TSB, Halifax and Bank of Scotland, and RBS/Natwest have announced that they will stop selling single premium PPI with unsecured personal loans by the end of this month.

It follows signs that the Competition Commission is considering a ban on PPI.

Despite warnings that it could result in more expensive loans, the Commission is expected to outlaw the sale of single premium policies when it announces its final proposals to clean up the PPI market in the coming weeks.

But despite calls from the City watchdog for all loans lenders to review their sales practices, some, such as Abbey and Nationwide, will continue to sell the policies.

  • Safety net?

PPI is supposed to be a safety net in case you suddenly lose your income through unemployment or ill health. But many of you were mis-sold policies and you would never have been able to make a claim. Particular problems surround single premium policies, where the cost of the cover is often added to the loan without your knowledge.

There have been more than 30,000 complaints about PPI to the independent complaints handling Financial Ombudsman Service, the majority of which have been upheld.

In October, Alliance & Leicester was fined a record £7 million penalty for mis-selling PPI. Egg, which was fined £721,000 in December for mis-selling, is still selling single premium PPI on its online loans, but says it plans to move to a monthly premium policy.

Have you been sold worthless loan payment cover?

Claim back your Payment Protection Insurance

  • Crackdown is welcomed

The move was welcomed by Jon Pain, of the Financial Services Authority,who said:

‘We are pleased these firms have stopped selling single premium policies and would expect other firms to notice these developments and review their own positions. A PPI product can be helpful for customers wanting protection on a specific credit agreement as long as the policy is sold appropriately.’

The Commission recommended a ban on single premium plans and it also suggested that lenders be prevented from contacting you about the insurance within 14 days of a credit agreement being signed, and also called for advertising on PPI to be made clearer.

Lenders say any ban would only force them to push up rates on loans because they would no longer be able to subsidise deals with profits earned from the insurance. PPI has been one of the biggest money spinners for banks and is worth an estimated £3.5 billion.

  • Lenders facing a losing battle!

But Louise Hanson, at Which?, the consumer group, said that PPI sellers know that they are facing a losing battle, saying:

“These firms have recognised that the party is over for single premium PPI and the rest should follow suit. People need to protect their finances more than ever so providers should be developing products that meet consumers’ needs and offer value for money. PPI has been widely mis-sold in the past so anyone with a personal loan should check if they have a single premium policy as they could claim their money back.’

Which? is using social networking site Facebook to encourage those of you that think you may have been mis-sold PPI to to reclaim your money.

It has launched Payback, an application designed to spread awareness of PPI among those of you who recent graduates or young professionals who may have been mis-sold a policy when you took out an unsecured loan or credit card.

Peter Jackson, of Lloyds Banking Group, said their decision to stop single premium sales was a direct response to consumer feedback, saying:

‘Lloyds TSB customers told us they valued the cover PPI provides but, as the economy moved into uncertain times, now wanted a more flexible product which would make it easier for them to manage their budgets”.

What do you make of the lender’s decision to stop selling PPI?

Given the amount of complaints, is it about time?

5 Responses to “Lenders to stop selling PPI”

  1. Halal Mortgages Says:
    Jan 26, 2009 at 9:14 am

    It’s about time all these practices were routed out. The time of honest banking has arrived.

  2. Sarah Says:
    Jan 26, 2009 at 9:52 am

    There’s nothing wrong with PPI….people are silly when it comes to stuff like that and don’t ask enough questions. You can’t be ‘mis-sold’ anything unless you aren’t paying attention. More nanny-state interference. But then even the banks can’t manage our economy it seems, so why should the man on the street be any different? People need more financial education so they can learn to look after themselves and their own finances! Banks are a business and have no moral obligation to pamper their financially-incompetant customers. Financial education should be made compulsory at school, but you can’t blame businesses for trying to please the shareholders, that’s what they are there to do.

  3. Andy Says:
    Jan 26, 2009 at 10:28 am

    I wonder which bank or PPI company Sarah works for? Let’s face it we used to trust banks. That trust was clearly misplaced. But there are still venerable people out there that need protection. And PPI is just the latest scandal. Endowment mis-selling, pension mis-selling and now PPI. Sarah makes a good point that banks cannot be trusted to provide what we need so we need to force them through much tighter regulation. Teaching lambs to fight is all very well but even if we do that they’ll still end up as dinner for the banking lions.

  4. beingsalt Says:
    Jan 26, 2009 at 4:30 pm

    nah, you know how it goes.. ‘would you like to protect your payments in case of difficulties, sir? [not exactly specific]…This is something we strongly recommend. The monthly payment is 117.43 instead of 109.88′ And you assume it will actually do what they’ve described. But it won’t, because these policies are chock-full of loopholes. That’s before you factor in that they’re really, really bad value(!) not least because the premium is added on at the start of the loan, then you pay interest on that as well as the loan for however many years that may be.

    The point is: the banks know all of the above, so do their salesmen, but they’re incentivised to sell PPI since it’s a real profit-maker. They’ve no immediate benefit in pointing out why the insurance might [i]not [/i]cover you. That’s why I agree with ‘missold’ in many cases, (sorry to disagree with you Sarah :))

  5. j Says:
    Mar 12, 2009 at 9:16 am

    im glad about this , like many my partner and i had PPI on a loan .
    Due to a unforseen illness i landed up losing my job as the time for treatments ,docs appointments went on for some time , i went to claim on the PPI , as it was sold to me to cover the loan and other bills in case of illness and unemplyment . The PPI company wrote a letter to my ex boss , and because he wrote back saying i had broken my terms of emplyment they refused to pay out . That policy cost me £4000 and interest charged on that on a monthly bases . At the time the policy was only 3 mths old , i tried to reclaim some of that money back by saying that i would pay for the 3 mths cover i had but would like to cancel the reminding term as the policy was clearly not as described and was told that i couldnt cancel or get a refund as its not the in companys policy ! I will never again take out this kind of so called protection .

Leave a Reply

  • (required)
  • (will not be published)